Dutch Journal of Finance and Management

Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 2020 - Volume 4 Issue 2, Article No: em0068
https://doi.org/10.21601/djfm/9345

Published Online: 28 Dec 2020

Views: 2576 | Downloads: 1266

Corporate effective tax rates (ETR) of large Nigerian listed firms during the new tax regime as well as the influence of firm size, leverage, return on asset, capital intensity, and inventory intensity on corporate effective tax rate was investigated. The study aims to examine the influence of some corporate tax attributes in some selected large public listed firms within and across Nigeria with avoidance of corporate effective tax rates (ETR). The data used in the study was extracted from the 2019 Nigeria Annual Financial reports. The data were collected from the period 2012 to 2018, the period where Nigeria imposed a new tax regime on the current year assessment system (effective from the year 2012). Pooled ordinary least square (POLS), fixed effect and random effect regression were applied to the data, findings from the study revealed that the random effect regression model was preferred for result interpretation. It was also discovered that; firm size (FSIZE), return on assets (ROA), and inventory intensity (INVINT) have a positive and significant influence on corporate effective tax rates (ETR) avoidance. Firm leverage (LEV) and capital intensity (CAPINT) on the other hand has an insignificant inverse influence on effective tax rates (ETR). Hence, this study suggested that firm size (FSIZE), return on assets (ROA), and inventory intensity (INVINT) is the major variable that positively influences the corporate effective tax rates (ETR) the listed large firms in Nigeria.

effective tax rates return on asset firm leverage firm size capital intensity inventory intensity

• Adhikari, A., Derashid, C. and Zhang, H. (2006). Public Policy, Political Connections, and Effective Tax Rates: Longitudinal Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(5), 574-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.07.001
• Atta-Mills, J. (2002). Improving resources and Organisational Structure of Tax Administration. Presentation at the 3rd Regional Workshop on taxation.
• Badarau-Semenescu, C. and Semenescu, A. (2010). Fiscal Policy and the Cost of External Finance to Firms: Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Implications. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 46(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X4603S103
• Calvé Pérez, J. I., Labatut Serer, G. and Molina Llopis, R. (2005). Variables económico-financieras que inciden sobre la presión fiscal soportada por lasempresas de reducida dimensión: Efectos de la reforma fiscal de 1995 en las empresas de la comunidad valenciana. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 34(127), 875-897. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2005.10779565
• Chen Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q. and Shevlin, T. J. (2010). Are Family Firms More Tax Aggressive Than Non-FamilyFirms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.02.003
• Chmelarova, V. (2007). The Hausman test, and Some Alternatives, with Heteroskedastic Data.
• Derashid, C. and Zhang, H. (2003). Effective Tax Rates and the ‘Industrial Policy’ Hypothesis: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 12(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(03)00003-X
• Desai, M. A. and Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537-546. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.3.537
• Desai, M. and Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate Tax Avoidance and High-Powered Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002
• Feeny, S., Gillman, M. and Harris, M. N. (2006). Econometric Accounting of the Australian Corporate Tax Rates: A Firm Panel Example. Accounting Research Journal, 19(1), 64-73.
• Fernández-Rodríguez, E. (2004). Los factores condicionantes de la presión fiscal empresarial española a partir de la información contable: Especial mención a las decisions financieras. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 33(120), 125-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2004.10779516
• Fernández-Rodríguez, E. and Martínez-Arias, A. (2011). Determinants of Effective Tax Rate: Evidence for the USA and the EU. Intertax, 39(8-9), 381-395.
• Fernández-Rodríguez, E. and Martínez-Arias, A. (2014). Determinants of Effective Tax Rate in the BRIC Countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(3), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X5003S313
• Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometric (4th Ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
• Gupta, S. and Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability of corporate effective tax rates: evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(96)00055-5
• Harris, M. and Feeny, S. (1999). The Determinants of Corporate Effective Tax Rates: Evidence from Australia. Working Paper no. 21/99, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Habit Persistence in Effective Tax Rates. Applied Economics, 35(8), 951-958. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684032000050577
• Harris, M. N. and Feeny, S. (2003). Habit persistence in effective tax rates. Applied Economics, 35(8), 951-958. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684032000050577
• Hausman, J. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827
• Janssen, B. (2005). Corporate Effective Tax Rates in the Netherlands. De Economist, 153(1), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-004-7127-y
• Kim, K. A. and Limpaphayom, P. (1998). Taxes and Firm Size in Pacific-Basin Emerging Economies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 7(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(98)90005-2
• Liu, X. and Cao, S. (2007). Determinants of Corporate Effective Tax Rates: Evidence from Listed Companies in China. Chinese Economy, 40(6), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475400603
• Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1963). Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review, 53(3), 433.
• Noor, R. M., Fadzillah, N. S. M. and Mastuki, N. (2010). Corporate Tax Planning: A Study on Corporate Effective Tax Rates of Malaysian Listed Companies. International Journal of Trade, Economics, and Finance, 1(2), 189-193. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2010.V1.34
• Oloyede, I. O. (2010). Repositioning the Nigeria’s Tax System: Suggestion Policy Measures. Available at: https://www.googlebooks.com
• Omer, T. C., Molloy, K. and Ziebart, D. (1993). An Investigation of the Firm Size Effective Tax Rate Relation in the 1980s. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 8(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X9300800206
• Pesaran, M., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. J. (2000). Structural Analysis of Vector Error Correction A model with Exogenous Variables. Journal of Econometrics, 97(2), 293-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00073-1
• Plesko, G. A. (2003). An Evaluation of Alternative Measures of Corporate Tax Rates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(2), 201-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(03)00019-3
• Porcano, T. M. (1986). Corporate Tax Rates: Progressive, Proportional, or Regressive. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 7(2), 17-31.
• Ribeiro, A. M. (2015). The determinants of effective tax rates: firm characteristics and corporate governance (Masters Thesis in Finance and Taxation), Universidad Do Porto.
• Richardson, G. and Lanis, R. (2007). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26, 689-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.10.003
• Richardson, G., Taylor, G. and Lanis, R. (2013). The impact of board director oversight characteristics on corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 68-88.
• Salaudeen, Y. M. (2017). Corporate Effective Tax Rates in the Financial Services Sector: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 5(1), 68-88. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijat.v5n1a6
• Stickney, C. P. and McGee, V. E. (1982). Effective Corporate Tax Rates: The Effect of Size, Capital Intensity, Leverage, and Other Factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1(2), 125-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(82)80004-5
• Teidi (2003). Federalism and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Nigeria, Ibadan: Spectrum Books Ltd.
• Wang, S. (1991). The Relation Between Firm Size and Effective Tax Rates: A Test of Firms’ Political Success. Accounting Review, 66(1), 158-169.
• Wilkinson, B., Cahan, S. and Jones, G. (2001). Strategies and Dividend Imputation: The Effect of Foreign and Domestic Ownership on Average Effective Tax Rate. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-9518(01)00042-8
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Zimmerman, J. (1983). Tax and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5(2), 119-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90008-3

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.